From: Johannes Schindelin Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:35:00 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] filter-branch: assume HEAD if no revision supplied Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <47A0D0F0.1020800@nrlssc.navy.mil> Hi, On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Brandon Casey wrote: > filter-branch previously took the first non-option argument as the name > for a new branch. Since dfd05e38, it now takes a revision or a revision > range and modifies the current branch. Update to operate on HEAD by > default to conform with standard git interface practice. FWIW I think the code wanted to let "git filter-branch" without options print the usage. Ciao, Dscho