Re: FEATURE REQUEST: git-format-path: Add option to encode patch content
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Apr 28, 2007, 00:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704271719240.9964@woody.linux-foundation.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <87tzv1nzd4.wl%cworth@cworth.org>
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Carl Worth wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> > And the reason I _hate_ attachements is that you cannot say "no, that one > > is wrong", and just skip/edit it. > > Well, skipping it while applying the rest is bad form anyway, isn't > it?
Why would it be?
Maybe for small projects with strictly linear development, but I get a _lot_ of patch-series where the patches are independent of each other. Andrew's patch-series are one example, but so is a lot of the "trivial tree" patch-series too.
Linus