Re: FEATURE REQUEST: git-format-path: Add option to encode patch content
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Apr 28, 2007, 00:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vtzv1l3oi.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704271719240.9964@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Carl Worth wrote: >> > And the reason I _hate_ attachements is that you cannot say "no, that one >> > is wrong", and just skip/edit it. >> >> Well, skipping it while applying the rest is bad form anyway, isn't >> it? > > Why would it be? > > Maybe for small projects with strictly linear development, but I get a > _lot_ of patch-series where the patches are independent of each other. > Andrew's patch-series are one example, but so is a lot of the "trivial > tree" patch-series too.
Seconded, even for a small project like git.git, I do that all the time.