Re: FEATURE REQUEST: git-format-path: Add option to encode patch content
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Apr 28, 2007, 00:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vps5pl3jl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <87y7kdo6pn.wl%cworth@cworth.org>
Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
>> In the community git originates from, even --inline attachments >> are frowned upon, let alone --attach multiparts (yes, I am >> talking about the kernel list and this list). Nobody who sends >> patches over e-mail in communities that have a tradition against >> unreadable patches would be using --inline nor --attach anyway, >> so making --attach to do base64 would not hurt there. > > I know I'm not within the kernel or git party line by saying this, but > I don't have a problem with (non base64) mime-attached patches. My MUA > displays them fine and quotes them when I reply so I can easily review > them.
You strayed into tangent here. You said you do not have a problem with non base64 attachments. I would like to know if you have or do not have problem with base64 ones, as that is what indicates your opinion on making --attach unconditionally do base64 which was the suggestion made in the thread.