Re: [BUG] Colon in remote urls
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Dec 12, 2016, 14:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.20.1612121453020.23160@virtualbox>
- In-Reply-To
- <20161212115030.qx2y276bxnzbtxkj@ikki.ethgen.ch>
Hi Klaus,
you probably missed the note about reply-to-all being customary on this list. The reason is that this list is high-volume, and open to non-subscribers. You may want to get into the habit of hitting reply-to-all when responding to mails from this list, in case that you plan to continue communicating on this forum.
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> Am Mo den 12. Dez 2016 um 12:03 schrieb Johannes Schindelin: > > On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > > Am Sa den 10. Dez 2016 um 19:18 schrieb Johannes Schindelin: > > > > On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > > > > Am Fr den 9. Dez 2016 um 22:32 schrieb Johannes Sixt: > > > > > > There are too many systems out there that use a backslash in path names. I > > > > > > don't think it is wise to use it also as the quoting character. > > > > > Well, the minority, I believe. And only the minority where the command > > > > > line git is used anywhere. > > > > Please provide evidence for such bold assumptions. > > > How is it "bold" to see that the majority of widows users does not use > > > or even like command line tools. > > > > Second, you still did not back up your claim with anything resembling > > evidence, instead just reiterating your beliefs. That is not good enough. > > Well, my evidence is what I seen with many windows users in the past. I > have no link or something like that. I just shared that observation.
Thank you for confirming that you just shared a personal observation and did not plan to back that up by scientific evidence.
In light of that, let's continue according to Johannes Sixt's insightful suggestions.
Ciao, Johannes