Re: Pull is Mostly Evil

> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Richard Hansen <rhansen@bbn.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> These three usage patterns are at odds; it's hard to change the
>>>> default behavior of 'git pull' to favor one usage case without
>>>> harming another.  Perhaps this is why there's so much disagreement
>>>> about what 'git pull' should do.
>>>
>>> Should a screwdriver be turning clockwise or counterclockwise by
>>> default?  There are valid arguments for either.
>>
>> If you don't have anything to contribute don't disturb the people that
>> actually care and are trying to improve Git. Thanks.
>
> No need to expand on the welcoming atmosphere here.

>  My heinous plot to
> subvert the quality of Git has already been thwarted by making sure that
> its "meritocracy" continues relying only on input from those with an
> independent income.  I'm just sticking around until my current
> contributions move into master so that I can summarize the resulting
> low-hanging fruit that the meritorious can then pick at great fanfare.
>
> The sooner my work moves from pu into master, the sooner y'all be rid of
> me.
>
>