Re: Pull is Mostly Evil

> On 2014-05-04 17:13, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > Richard Hansen wrote:
> >> On 2014-05-04 06:17, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >>> Richard Hansen wrote:
> >>>> On 2014-05-03 23:08, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >>>>> It is the only solution that has been proposed.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's not the only proposal -- I proposed a few alternatives in my
> >>>> earlier email (though not in the form of code), and others have too.  In
> >>>> particular:
> >>>>
> >>>>   * create a new 'git integrate' command/alias that behaves like 'git
> >>>>     pull --no-ff'
> >>>
> >>> Yeah but that's for a different issue altogheter. I doesn't solve the
> >>> problems in 1. nor 2. nor 3.
> >>
> >> 'git integrate' would handle usage cases #2 (update a published branch
> >> to its "parent" branch) and #3 (integrate a completed task into the main
> >> line of development),
> > 
> > But these cases are completely different. One should reverse the
> > parents, the other one not.
> 
> No -- for both #2 and #3 I want the remote branch to be merged into the
> local branch.