Re: translation difficulties :: revision and commit
- From
Peter Krefting <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
- Date
- Apr 28, 2011, 09:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104281058560.7540@perkele.intern.softwolves.pp.se>
- In-Reply-To
- <1303934784.25134.74.camel@drew-northup.unet.maine.edu>
Drew Northup:
>> For Swedish, I used a translation of "check-in" (as when checking in at an >> airport) for "commit", both in the verb and noun forms.
> If you seek to avoid SVN-isms I suggest thinking about the > deconstruction of "commit" in the context we are using it:
I don't know much about Subversionisms, never really having used Subversion (but I have used CVS extensively, so I am a bit damaged), so I cannot comment on that.
> "to commit the current state of the working directory as known by Git to > the recorded history."
The problem, at least for Swedish, is that if I want to translate that sentence, finding a good word to replace "commit" is very difficult, even when it is used properly like this. Some things just don't translate very well into other languages.
> So far as the language element is concerned, it could have been chosen to > be a "flubberbudget" and provided nobody attempted suggesting to Linus > that he'd be insane for calling it that it would have had a decent chance > of staying that way. ;-)
Speaking of Linus, his native tounge is the same as mine, so I will let him have the power to override my Swedish translation of Git & co, if he sees fit :-)
-- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/