Re: [PATCH] Add new git-remote-hd helper
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Oct 21, 2012, 20:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.1210212138290.2695@bonsai2>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s0jgxqb8EyjCcEdzaDR6y8gqydW7X-C268NahjaXMrh6A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Felipe,
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Johannes Schindelin > <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > > Without push support, remote-hg is useless to me. Without regression > > tests proving that it is rock solid, I will not use remote-hg. > > Done and done. My remote-hg now has support for pushing, all in less > than 500 lines of code. It also manages to pass all 14 of the "extensive > tests" of your remote-hg. Anything else?
While I think that a lot of effort was duplicated now, and while I am still interested in less handwaving arguments than "I find the code bloated", I will compare the performance on both hg and openjdk and if I do not find any issues, have a look at the code, too.
That will have to wait until I am home in a bit more than a week, though.
Ciao, Johannes
P.S.: Sverre's remote-hg does not really handle octopus merges. It is incomplete. I had a good plan how to complete it (see the msysGit wiki page about remote-hg) but lacked the time to implement it (the problem is that hg does not have octopus merges, and we want things to be bidirectional).