From: Johannes Schindelin Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 20:03:31 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add new git-remote-hd helper Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Hi Felipe, On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Johannes Schindelin > wrote: > > > Without push support, remote-hg is useless to me. Without regression > > tests proving that it is rock solid, I will not use remote-hg. > > Done and done. My remote-hg now has support for pushing, all in less > than 500 lines of code. It also manages to pass all 14 of the "extensive > tests" of your remote-hg. Anything else? While I think that a lot of effort was duplicated now, and while I am still interested in less handwaving arguments than "I find the code bloated", I will compare the performance on both hg and openjdk and if I do not find any issues, have a look at the code, too. That will have to wait until I am home in a bit more than a week, though. Ciao, Johannes P.S.: Sverre's remote-hg does not really handle octopus merges. It is incomplete. I had a good plan how to complete it (see the msysGit wiki page about remote-hg) but lacked the time to implement it (the problem is that hg does not have octopus merges, and we want things to be bidirectional).