Re: [PATCH] Add new git-remote-hd helper
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Oct 17, 2012, 17:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.1210171936170.3049@bonsai2>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s1WY+Q7jyy4PQvwff7JSxHsnkhrPWozOLnNuNOrn7FGBA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Johannes Schindelin > <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > > >> I've looked at many hg<->git tools and none satisfy me. Too > >> complicated, or too slow, or to difficult to setup, etc. > > > > The one I merged into Git for Windows (since that is what I install on > > all my machines even if they run Linux) is rock-solid. It also comes > > with tests. And it requires a fix I tried to get into git.git (but > > failed, since I was asked to do much more in addition to what I needed > > for myself, and I lack the time to address such requests these days). > > Maybe, but who uses it? It's quite a lot of code, and it's quite > difficult to setup--you would need a non-vanilla version of git.
Okay, so the difficulty of setting it up is because it is not in mainline git.git?
Show 5 quoted lines
> Compare this: > 32 files changed, 3351 insertions(+), 289 deletions(-) > > To this: > 1 file changed, 231 insertions(+)
Yeah, and that's also because of the severe lack of tests. And the lack of possible code-sharing with other remote helpers.
As for who uses it:
https://github.com/dscho/hg
> It would be better to work together, but to me the code-styles are way > too different, the difference between night and day.
Aha. Well, okay, it was an offer to collaborate.
Ciao, Johannes