Re: wiki "abuse"
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Aug 9, 2010, 23:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.1008100051440.2983@bonsai2>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTimr8vDeyRLLjM+J2Z1zmdiXjwZEw2JAXeXvzNt6@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Here's a useful Wikipedia guideline: assume good faith: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith
For the dear love of God.
Just assume -- hypothetically -- for one second that you, Felipe Contreras, tried to create a user page on http://subversion.tigris.org/wiki/ reading like this:
-- snip -- Felipe E. Contreras, a proud Git user.
* [http://felipec.wordpress.com/ Felipe Contreras] ** [http://felipec.wordpress.com/tag/git/ Keep an open mind] ** [http://whygitisbetterthanx.com/ Git is better] -- snap --
only that the last link was to one of your blog posts and was not well researched.
If you still think that such a completely unbiased and uncontroversial user page was a good idea, well, you should take over the monitoring of the Git Wiki, I guess, and make sure you remove all link spam. Actually, I like that idea. Can you do that, please? Can you watch the recent changes of the Git Wiki and keep it a place where information is king? Thank you so much in advance!