Re: wiki "abuse"

From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 9, 2010, 21:21 UTC
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=A9m=y4r4Y0q2GLwT1gubyoC_-XaXg+6-RfrGn@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikNDdi1gDaoWdHsiUPLW2CtZMP0J2c94DpLA=AV@mail.gmail.com>

2010/8/9 Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>:

Show 7 quoted lines

> Heya,
>
> 2010/8/9 René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>:
>> In the mails in this thread he doesn't look very trollish to me, and he
>> didn't have much of a chance to contribute something useful to the wiki.
>
> He had a full day.

You must be one of those übermench to whom the concept of procrastination is unknown :)

>>  What are the grounds of your verdict?
>
> Contents of the profile page, and high troll content of this thread.

FWIW the contents were (sorry Johannes):

    Amir E. Aharoni, a proud SVN user.

    * [http://aharoni.wordpress.com/ Aharoni in Unicode, ya mama - blog]
    ** [http://aharoni.wordpress.com/2010/08/05/advocacy-for-the-uncool/ a
    reality check for git fanboys]

FWIW he seems to be able to contribute to Wikipedia without being banned for trolling: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Amire80

As an aside, that's not an unusual user page for Wikipedia. Which I think goes a long way to clearing up the obvious culture clash here.

Anyway, let's try to shoot first and ask questions later, or was that the other way around?