Re: wiki "abuse"
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 9, 2010, 22:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTimr8vDeyRLLjM+J2Z1zmdiXjwZEw2JAXeXvzNt6@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTi=dGWaRa3HR4nb6Ka1+0CovrBMnyZts5d8RZW1c@mail.gmail.com>
2010/8/10 Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>:
> 2010/8/9 Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>: >> Huh? He is still blocked AFAICS: > > Yes, but _before_ he was blocked.
He said the first thing he does in a wiki is to edit his user page.
Anyway, I don't see why are we arguing this, by well-intentioned I meant not linking to party poker or something like that. He couldn't know that editing his user page was frowned-upon since there are no guidelines about it, so he didn't do anything wrong. Just unblock him.
Here's a useful Wikipedia guideline: assume good faith: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith
Show 6 quoted lines
>> That would make certain pages not useful: >> https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitProjects > > That page is just as useful as or nofollow attribute. The only thing > the nofollow attribute does is makes the pagerank not flow through. It > doesn't make that page any less useful as a jump-board for humans.
Oh, OK then.
-- Felipe Contreras