Re: Fetching SHA id's instead of named references?
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Apr 6, 2009, 12:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0904061447220.6619@intel-tinevez-2-302>
- In-Reply-To
- <33f4f4d70904060541s6dfb7e8ctf50f5e8a872ae1c@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Klas Lindberg wrote:
> Thank you, but I don't understand the answer. If I mistakenly publish a > tree that contains secrets and someone manages to fetch against it > before I correct the mistake; how does the limitation to only fetch > named references help me???
The issue is not if someone manages to fetch stuff before you repair it. The issue is that that someone should not be able to manage _after_ you repair it.
Oh, and please do not top-post, Dscho