From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:48:17 GMT
Subject: Re: Fetching SHA id's instead of named references?
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0904061447220.6619@intel-tinevez-2-302>
In-Reply-To: <33f4f4d70904060541s6dfb7e8ctf50f5e8a872ae1c@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Klas Lindberg wrote:

> Thank you, but I don't understand the answer. If I mistakenly publish a 
> tree that contains secrets and someone manages to fetch against it 
> before I correct the mistake; how does the limitation to only fetch 
> named references help me???

The issue is not if someone manages to fetch stuff before you repair it.  
The issue is that that someone should not be able to manage _after_ you 
repair it.

Oh, and please do not top-post,
Dscho