Re: Fetching SHA id's instead of named references?
- From
Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 6, 2009, 21:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <37fcd2780904061450t62cac214x7588e056a6450bab@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0904061447220.6619@intel-tinevez-2-302>
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:48:17PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>_ > The issue is not if someone manages to fetch stuff before you repair it.__ > The issue is that that someone should not be able to manage _after_ you_ > repair it.
But how this someone will know the exact SHA-1 needed to fetch this commit without having seen this commit already? Guessing SHA-1 by brute force attack does not sound very promising...
Dmitry