Re: Fetching SHA id's instead of named references?
- From
- Klas Lindberg <klas.lindberg@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 6, 2009, 12:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <33f4f4d70904060541s6dfb7e8ctf50f5e8a872ae1c@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0904061431020.6619@intel-tinevez-2-302>
Hello
Thank you, but I don't understand the answer. If I mistakenly publish a tree that contains secrets and someone manages to fetch against it before I correct the mistake; how does the limitation to only fetch named references help me???
By the way: I don't use push. I'd be perfectly happy if just fetch supported SHA key references.
BR / Klas
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> Hi, > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Klas Lindberg wrote: > >> Is there a way to fetch based on SHA id's instead of named references? > > No, out of security concerns; imagine you included some proprietary > source code by mistake, and undo the damage by forcing a push with a > branch that does not have the incriminating code. Usually you do not > control the garbage-collection on the server, yet you still do not want > other people to fetch "by SHA-1". > > BTW this is really a strong reason not to use HTTP push in such > environments. > > Ciao, > Dscho >