Re: Addremove equivalent [was: Re: Considering teaching plumbing to users harmful]

From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Jul 18, 2008, 23:03 UTC
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807190102390.3064@eeepc-johanness>
In-Reply-To: <76718490807181318o228171f9j836aaca2edb9b377@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Jay Soffian wrote:

Show 8 quoted lines

> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Michael J Gruber
> <michaeljgruber+gmane@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > sometimes I find my self wanting an "addremove", such as in a situation like
> 
> I have the following aliased as "addremove":
> 
>   git ls-files -d -m -o -z --exclude-standard \
>   | xargs -0 git update-index --add --remove

But that is everything, _except_ easy for newbies!!!

I still suggest "git add -u && git add .".

Hth, Dscho

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.