Re: Considering teaching plumbing to users harmful
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jul 17, 2008, 18:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807171915420.8986@racer>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080717155538.GE11759@fieldses.org>
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:51:31PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> >
> > > Am I the only one who deems teaching plumbing to users ("I like it raw!
> > > So I teach it the same way!") harmful?
> >
> > I think that justification is harmful.
> >
> > More productive way to think about it is to identify cases where we _need_
> > to go down to combination of the plumbing commands in our daily workflow,
> > with today's command set. That would give us a good indication that some
> > Porcelain may need to be enhanced.
>
> Is there a way to commit the contents of a tarball without using
> plumbing? I occasionally want to track an upstream that I know only as
> a series of tarballs, so I do something like:
>
> cd repo/
> git checkout upstream
> rm -rf *
> tar -xzvf ../new-version.tar.gzHow about "git add -u" and "git add ."?
Ciao, Dscho