Re: [PATCH] mailsplit and mailinfo: gracefully handle NUL characters
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- May 17, 2008, 10:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0805171117010.30431@racer>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080517100726.GA24416@cuci.nl>
Hi,
On Sat, 17 May 2008, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin wrote: > >On Fri, 16 May 2008, Avery Pennarun wrote: > >> fread is about 18x faster than fgetc(). getc() is the same speed as > >> fgetc(). getc_unlocked() is definitely faster than getc, but still at > >> least 7x slower than fread(). > > >Well, my question was more about fgetc() vs fgets(). > >If you feel like it, you might benchmark this patch: > > Wouldn't it be better to improve the implementation of getc() > in glibc instead?
Sure, because glibc is used on Windows, AIX, Solaris, etc.
> getc() is meant to be the fast version of fgetc(), and if it isn't > (anymore), then the library needs fixing.
fgetc() has to work reliably in a threaded environment, too. So I guess that it does all kinds of locks that slow it down, but it is not something to be "fixed".
Hth, Dscho