Re: [PATCH 8/9] Allow specifying compatibility hash

From

brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>

Date

Sep 30, 2025, 16:44 UTC

Message-ID

<aNwI9gLAGp7QvpI4@fruit.crustytoothpaste.net>

In-Reply-To

<aNOkEVUag91bv2RP@pks.im>

On 2025-09-24 at 07:56:01, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:

> Makes sense, I guess. It's a bit hard to judge without seeing any actual
> tests, but I don't think that should hold off adding the infrastructure.
> Worst case we can still adjust it at later point in time.

I'll send in an example test as part of v2.

> >  '
> > +# BROKEN_OBJECTS is a test if we can write deliberately broken objects and
> 
> s/if/whether/

Fixed in v2.

-- 
brian m. carlson (they/them)
Toronto, Ontario, CA