From: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 16:44:38 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] Allow specifying compatibility hash
Message-ID: <aNwI9gLAGp7QvpI4@fruit.crustytoothpaste.net>
In-Reply-To: <aNOkEVUag91bv2RP@pks.im>

On 2025-09-24 at 07:56:01, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> Makes sense, I guess. It's a bit hard to judge without seeing any actual
> tests, but I don't think that should hold off adding the infrastructure.
> Worst case we can still adjust it at later point in time.

I'll send in an example test as part of v2.

> >  '
> > +# BROKEN_OBJECTS is a test if we can write deliberately broken objects and
> 
> s/if/whether/

Fixed in v2.
-- 
brian m. carlson (they/them)
Toronto, Ontario, CA