Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] remote.c: convert if-else ladder to switch
- From
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
- Date
- Aug 8, 2025, 05:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <aJWOcDN2LZaMzaqH@pks.im>
- In-Reply-To
- <ee6d69bcafeda9d8a2cdfd1f8bb62c28c13941f9.1754627874.git.liu.denton@gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 09:41:11PM -0700, Denton Liu wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
> index 88f991795b..61e2c9951a 100644
> --- a/remote.c
> +++ b/remote.c
> @@ -1171,7 +1171,6 @@ static void show_push_unqualified_ref_name_error(const char *dst_value,
> const char *matched_src_name)
> {
> struct object_id oid;
> - enum object_type type;Show 39 quoted lines
> @@ -1196,28 +1195,33 @@ static void show_push_unqualified_ref_name_error(const char *dst_value,
> BUG("'%s' is not a valid object, "
> "match_explicit_lhs() should catch this!",
> matched_src_name);
> - type = odb_read_object_info(the_repository->objects, &oid, NULL);
> - if (type == OBJ_COMMIT) {
> +
> + switch (odb_read_object_info(the_repository->objects, &oid, NULL)) {
> + case OBJ_COMMIT:
> advise(_("The <src> part of the refspec is a commit object.\n"
> "Did you mean to create a new branch by pushing to\n"
> "'%s:refs/heads/%s'?"),
> matched_src_name, dst_value);
> - } else if (type == OBJ_TAG) {
> + break;
> + case OBJ_TAG:
> advise(_("The <src> part of the refspec is a tag object.\n"
> "Did you mean to create a new tag by pushing to\n"
> "'%s:refs/tags/%s'?"),
> matched_src_name, dst_value);
> - } else if (type == OBJ_TREE) {
> + break;
> + case OBJ_TREE:
> advise(_("The <src> part of the refspec is a tree object.\n"
> "Did you mean to tag a new tree by pushing to\n"
> "'%s:refs/tags/%s'?"),
> matched_src_name, dst_value);
> - } else if (type == OBJ_BLOB) {
> + break;
> + case OBJ_BLOB:
> advise(_("The <src> part of the refspec is a blob object.\n"
> "Did you mean to tag a new blob by pushing to\n"
> "'%s:refs/tags/%s'?"),
> matched_src_name, dst_value);
> - } else {
> + break;
> + default:
> BUG("'%s' should be commit/tag/tree/blob, is '%d'",
> matched_src_name, type);We can't remove the `type` variable in this patch already -- it's still used by this call to `BUG()`. But we can drop the variable in the next patch, where that call is converted to `advise()`.
So I'd recommend to either move this patch to after the next patch or to keep the `type` variable here and remove it in the next patch.
Patrick