Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] unit tests: Add a project plan document
- From
Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
- Date
- Oct 11, 2023, 21:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ZScQG5QHznMEGzhC@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <ZSUR+YdzqNTSB0XC@ugly>
On 2023.10.10 10:57, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 03:21:20PM -0700, Josh Steadmon wrote: > > +=== Comparison > > + > > +[format="csv",options="header",width="33%"] > > +|===== > > +Framework,"<<license,License>>","<<vendorable-or-ubiquitous,Vendorable or ubiquitous>>","<<maintainable-extensible,Maintainable / extensible>>","<<major-platform-support,Major platform support>>","<<tap-support,TAP support>>","<<diagnostic-output,Diagnostic output>>","<<runtime--skippable-tests,Runtime- skippable tests>>","<<parallel-execution,Parallel execution>>","<<mock-support,Mock support>>","<<signal-error-handling,Signal & error handling>>","<<project-kloc,Project KLOC>>","<<adoption,Adoption>>" > > > the redundancy seems unnecessary; asciidoc should automatically use each > target's section title as the xreflabel.
Hmm, this doesn't seem to work for me. It only renders as "[anchor-label]".
Show 11 quoted lines
> > +https://lore.kernel.org/git/c902a166-98ce-afba-93f2-ea6027557176@gmail.com/[Custom Git impl.],[lime-background]#GPL v2#,[lime-background]#True#,[lime-background]#True#,[lime-background]#True#,[lime-background]#True#,[lime-background]#True#,[lime-background]#True#,[red-background]#False#,[red-background]#False#,[red-background]#False#,1,0 > > +https://github.com/silentbicycle/greatest[Greatest],[lime-background]#ISC#,[lime-background]#True#,[yellow-background]#Partial#,[lime-background]#True#,[yellow-background]#Partial#,[lime-background]#True#,[lime-background]#True#,[red-background]#False#,[red-background]#False#,[red-background]#False#,3,1400 > > +https://github.com/Snaipe/Criterion[Criterion],[lime-background]#MIT#,[red-background]#False#,[yellow-background]#Partial#,[lime-background]#True#,[lime-background]#True#,[lime-background]#True#,[lime-background]#True#,[lime-background]#True#,[red-background]#False#,[lime-background]#True#,19,1800 > > +https://github.com/rra/c-tap-harness/[C TAP],[lime-background]#Expat#,[lime-background]#True#,[yellow-background]#Partial#,[yellow-background]#Partial#,[lime-background]#True#,[red-background]#False#,[lime-background]#True#,[red-background]#False#,[red-background]#False#,[red-background]#False#,4,33 > > +https://libcheck.github.io/check/[Check],[lime-background]#LGPL v2.1#,[red-background]#False#,[yellow-background]#Partial#,[lime-background]#True#,[lime-background]#True#,[lime-background]#True#,[red-background]#False#,[red-background]#False#,[red-background]#False#,[lime-background]#True#,17,973 > > +|===== > > + > i find this totally unreadable in its raw form. > consider user-defined document-attributes for specific cell contents. > externalizing the urls would probably help as well (i'm not sure how to do > that best).
Ah yeah, user-defined attributes definitely cleans this up quite a bit. Thanks for the tip!