Re: [PATCH v3 12/20] t: refactor tests depending on Perl to print data

From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Date: Apr 2, 2025, 07:16 UTC
Message-ID: <Z-zkOFD8PRS4L7Ed@pks.im>
In-Reply-To: <4d461a62-9cf5-c64d-cd97-c70ef53afbac@gmx.de>

On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 08:35:25PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

Show 15 quoted lines

> Hi Patrick,
> 
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2025, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> 
> > A bunch of tests rely on Perl to print data in various different ways.
> > These usages fall into the following categories:
> >
> >   - Print data conditionally by matching patterns. These usecases can be
> >     converted to use awk(1) rather easily.
> >
> >   - Print data repeatedly. These usecases can typically be converted to
> >     use a combination of `test-tool genzeros` and sed(1).
> 
> It might be even more elegant to teach `genzeros` to generate streams of
> bytes other than NUL.

Agreed, that would feel more elegant indeed (well, despite the name being inaccurate now). I decided against doing this so that we don't have to introduce too many tools, but wouldn't mind doing so if you or other people feel strongly about it.

> >   - Print data in reverse. These usecases can be converted to use
> >     awk(1).
> 
> Or, in one case, `sort -r`.

True, fixed.

Patrick