Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] doc: add an option to have Asciidoctor build man pages directly
On 2021-05-14 at 03:58:12, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> It is curious that {plus} for Asciidoctor is deffined only for
> manpages and HTML/XML side lacks the definition. Intended?Yes, that's intended, because the behavior is already correct there.
> It seems that the latter has several more "attributes" defined that
> we do not replicate in the Makefile---I wonder if that is a sign
> that we can get rid of entries for asterisk, caret, startsb,
> etc. from asciidoc.conf?
I can't speak to the Python implementation, but maybe someone else can.
--
brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them)
Houston, Texas, US