Re: [PATCH 1/2] doc: add an option to have Asciidoctor build man pages directly
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 12, 2021, 19:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <609c2cb5a88ba_71bd1208b3@natae.notmuch>
- In-Reply-To
- <YJt81neO7zsGz2ah@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> We seem to have a problem with some escape codes. E.g.: > > - of nothing). The other file, git-add--interactive.perl, has 403 > - lines added and 35 lines deleted if you commit what is in the > - index, but working tree file has further modifications (one > + of nothing). The other file, git-add--interactive.perl, > + has 403 lines added and 35 lines deleted if you commit what is in > + the index, but working tree file has further modifications (one > > and: > > - Added content is represented by lines beginning with "+". You can > - prevent staging any addition lines by deleting them. > + Added content is represented by lines beginning with "+". You > + can prevent staging any addition lines by deleting them. > > which is a pretty bad regression.
Is it? At leat in my system both are rendered correctly.
Show 7 quoted lines
> The trailer misses the version field: > > -Git omitted 1970-01-01 GIT-ADD(1) > +Git 1970-01-01 GIT-ADD(1) > > The "omitted" is part of doc-diff's attempt to reduce noise in the > diff. But you can see that it's missing entirely in the direct version.
This is indeed a limitation of asciidoctor: manversion is ignored.
I have a fix for that. I'll send it to the asciidoctor project.
Show 14 quoted lines
> There are lots of whitespace changes for lists. They mostly seem fine > either way. It also formats numbered lists differently: > > - 1. Delete the remote-tracking branches "todo", "html" and > + (1) Delete the remote-tracking branches "todo", "html" and > "man". The next fetch or pull will create them again > unless you configure them not to. See git-fetch(1). > - 2. Delete the "test" branch even if the "master" branch (or > + (2) Delete the "test" branch even if the "master" branch (or > whichever branch is currently checked out) does not have > all commits from the test branch. > > I prefer the original, but could live with the latter (IIRC, this is > something that can be configured via asciidoctor, but I didn't dig).
It is not a numbered list, it is a reference. I actually prefer the (n) version.
Show 7 quoted lines
> Links are a bit harder to read. E.g.: > > SEE ALSO > git-check-ref-format(1), git-fetch(1), git-remote(1), “Understanding > - history: What is a branch?”[1] in the Git User’s Manual. > + history: What is <user-manual.html#what-is-a-branch> a branch?”" in the > + Git User’s Manual.
That indeed looks weird. I'm not exactly sure how to fix that properly.
-- Felipe Contreras