Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] object-file: refactor map_loose_object_1()
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Dec 9, 2022, 20:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Y5OaLKmIXvbEI1bP@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20221209181704.106534-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 10:17:04AM -0800, Jonathan Tan wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > > If you take my suggestion on patch 3, then the only other caller of > > map_loose_object_1() goes away, and we can fold it all into one > > reasonably-named function: > > Ah, that is true as of this patch, but patch 3 introduces another caller > of this function. I tried to allude to it in the commit message, but if > there is a clearer way to explain that, please let me know.
Yes, that's the "other caller" I was referring to. :) Hopefully it is more clear after you read my comments on v3.
-Peff