Re: [PATCH 6/6] fixup! reftable: rest of library
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Dec 2, 2020, 01:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <X8by+j24ccvt0F04@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2012011519340.54@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 03:24:01PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > I don't see it being invoked anywhere, > > It is invoked in `t/t0032-reftable-unittest.sh`: > https://github.com/dscho/git/blob/reftable-on-windows/t/t0032-reftable-unittest.sh
Ah, thank you. I was looking at what Junio has queued in hn/reftable.
Show 5 quoted lines
> > but presumably if we were to add support to our test suite, we'd have a > > script which invokes it within a scratch directory. > > I agree that it would make most sense for t0032 to prefix the call to > `test-tool` with `TMPDIR=$PWD`.
Yep, that would be fine.
I'm not sure if the long-term goal is to have this opaque unit-test program or not. If it is, I was likewise going to suggest that its ad-hoc output be replaced with TAP. But it looks like on your branch that "test-tool reftable" does not produce output at all. So I may be a bit behind on what the current state and forward plans are...
-Peff