Re: Git User's Survey 2007 summary - git homepage improvements

From: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Date: Oct 17, 2007, 20:45 UTC
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710171638120.32497@iabervon.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071017002648.GH13801@spearce.org>

On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

Show 18 quoted lines

> Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:12:47PM +0200, Jan Hudec wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 00:56:18 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 12:05:22AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> > > > > Generic:
> > > > >  # Dedicated domain name / site name, e.g. git.org or git.com
> ...
> > > > (And I guess something like git-scm.org wouldn't qualify as more
> > > > "official", would it?)
> > > 
> ...
> > If someone trustworthy in the community has the resources to sponsor the
> > domain, I will only be happy and gladly set it up on my side (I can run
> > the nameservers myself too, if required).  But I don't have the
> > resources for registering the domain myself, unfortunately.
> 
> "git" is a three letter word.  I don't think there have been *any*
> three letter .com/.org/.net domains available for years.

If anyone's in London, and could ask an Andy Ritchie nicely, http://git.org/ doesn't seem to be doing much, and we might be able to get a redirect.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*