From: Daniel Barkalow Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:45:07 GMT Subject: Re: Git User's Survey 2007 summary - git homepage improvements Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20071017002648.GH13801@spearce.org> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > Petr Baudis wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:12:47PM +0200, Jan Hudec wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 00:56:18 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 12:05:22AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > > > Generic: > > > > > # Dedicated domain name / site name, e.g. git.org or git.com > ... > > > > (And I guess something like git-scm.org wouldn't qualify as more > > > > "official", would it?) > > > > ... > > If someone trustworthy in the community has the resources to sponsor the > > domain, I will only be happy and gladly set it up on my side (I can run > > the nameservers myself too, if required). But I don't have the > > resources for registering the domain myself, unfortunately. > > "git" is a three letter word. I don't think there have been *any* > three letter .com/.org/.net domains available for years. If anyone's in London, and could ask an Andy Ritchie nicely, http://git.org/ doesn't seem to be doing much, and we might be able to get a redirect. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*