Re: Git User's Survey 2007 summary - git homepage improvements
- From
Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
- Date
- Oct 14, 2007, 22:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20071014225618.GH31659@planck.djpig.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <8fe92b430710141505y75ab61c4l50688fc9530e4f90@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 12:05:22AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Generic: > # Dedicated domain name / site name, e.g. git.org or git.com > to have it look less like mirror or unofficial page > > (git.or.cz still comes first when searching Google for "git"; > current domain name was available to homepage admin - historical > reason)
Hmm, I guess most names that would qualify are already taken (most of them by squatters, though). So someone would have to pay money for this... (And I guess something like git-scm.org wouldn't qualify as more "official", would it?)
However, I have to admit I had quite some problems remembering the domain name myself in the beginning...
> Downloads: > # More up-to-date about new git versions. > > (With one person updating homepage, who is not git maintainer...)
There are use-cases for shared repositories. Maybe this is one of them?
Gruesse,
-- Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de> www: http://www.djpig.de/