Re: Git User's Survey 2007 summary - git homepage improvements

From: Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
Date: Oct 16, 2007, 20:12 UTC
Message-ID: <20071016201247.GH26127@efreet.light.src>
In-Reply-To: <20071014225618.GH31659@planck.djpig.de>

On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 00:56:18 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:

Show 14 quoted lines

> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 12:05:22AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> > Generic:
> >  # Dedicated domain name / site name, e.g. git.org or git.com
> >    to have it look less like mirror or unofficial page
> > 
> >    (git.or.cz still comes first when searching Google for "git";
> >    current domain name was available to homepage admin - historical
> >    reason)
> 
> Hmm, I guess most names that would qualify are already taken
> (most of them by squatters, though). So someone
> would have to pay money for this...
> (And I guess something like git-scm.org wouldn't qualify as more
> "official", would it?)

It certainly would. It would be 2nd level domain, not a 3rd level one.

Note, that none of the other vcs' have a homepage at theirname.org -- subversion is svn.tigris.org, bazaar is bazaaz-vcs.org, mercurial is www.selenic.com/mercurial, svk is svk.bestpractical.com, monotone is monotone.ca. So git-vcs.org would be quite good.

-- 
						 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>