Re: [PATCH v3] Support ent:relative_path
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- May 6, 2007, 23:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705070110040.4167@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v1whtdfd2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Hi,
On Sun, 6 May 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > On Sat, 5 May 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > >> > >> >> (a) In a bare repository, I believe > >> >> setup.c:setup_git_directory_gently() determines the prefix to be > >> >> NULL. This means my patch will see ALL paths as absolute, except > >> >> :../path which will result in an error. > >> > > >> > My point was that it feels inconsistent to take the current path into > >> > account in one case, but not in the other. > >> > >> I do not understand your reasoning. In a bare repository you cannot > >> even be in a subdirectory to begin with. > > > > Exactly! That is my point. If you can do it in a working directory, but > > also with a bare repository, I find it highly confusing and inconsistent > > to have different meaning. > > Sorry. Now you confused me further. I can do: > > cd Documentation > git diff v1.5.0 v1.5.1 -- git.txt > > Is that confusing, inconsistent and bad for the users?
Well, I am partly at fault that you _can_ execute git-diff outside of a repository.
But given the _arguments_ you give to git-diff as above, I'd expect it to actually care about the working directory. IOW I would _not_ expect this to work outside of a working directory (even if it does).
Ciao, Dscho