Re: What's in git.git
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- May 10, 2006, 04:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605092117240.3718@g5.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7viroezi8s.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Junio C Hamano: > binary patch. > binary diff: further updates.
Btw, am I just smoking stuff, or is this going to be fundamentally problematic for "git-apply -R" if we ever want to support that?
I think the new binary diff is non-reversible. That's ok right now, since we don't actually support patching in reverse (if you want to get the reverse patch, you need to _diff_ it in reverse and then patch it that way).
But at least in theory we might well want to do "-R" eventually.
Hmm? Or did I just mis-understand the format?
Linus