From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 04:21:07 GMT Subject: Re: What's in git.git Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7viroezi8s.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> On Tue, 9 May 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Junio C Hamano: > binary patch. > binary diff: further updates. Btw, am I just smoking stuff, or is this going to be fundamentally problematic for "git-apply -R" if we ever want to support that? I think the new binary diff is non-reversible. That's ok right now, since we don't actually support patching in reverse (if you want to get the reverse patch, you need to _diff_ it in reverse and then patch it that way). But at least in theory we might well want to do "-R" eventually. Hmm? Or did I just mis-understand the format? Linus