Re: [Census] So who uses git?
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- Feb 1, 2006, 19:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602011124090.21884@g5.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602011909330.6498@beast.quantumfyre.co.uk>
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Julian Phillips wrote:
> > As it happens, yes ... I can't say that I've noticed git being particularly > slow, but then - I've not tried running git with a local repos ... ;)
Well, NFS seems to be ok. Which is not that surprising: NFS has gotten a _lot_ of attention in the caching area (I worked on it myself a couple of years back when the page cache transition happened during 2.3.x, but happily we've had very good NFS maintainership since, so I don't get involved any more).
Your numbers show that NFS is fine (my "benchmark" is that I refuse to see the kinds of commit times that "cvs commit" does - easily several minutes for a big project. If it goes over 2 seconds, it's painful, and over ten seconds is totally unacceptable).
Your numbers seem to say that at least with a good network/server, NFS on Linux is not a problem at all.
CIFS is likely a very different animal. I suspect the cifs people have spent a whole lot more effort on strange Windows interaction issues than on trying to make sure that cached performance is top-notch.
Linus