Re: [Census] So who uses git?

From: Radoslaw Szkodzinski <astralstorm@gorzow.mm.pl>
Date: Jan 31, 2006, 21:02 UTC
Message-ID: <43DFD07D.7000903@gorzow.mm.pl>
In-Reply-To: <7v8xsww2kt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 13 quoted lines

> Radoslaw Szkodzinski <astralstorm@gorzow.mm.pl> writes:
> 
>> Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote:
>>> Cloning without -l option is much slower - some minutes vs below a minute.
>>> I could have time(8)d it, but it's no use.
>>>
>> Make that time(1)d.
>>
>> Results for the kernel follow. Disc cache has been preheated with find.
> 
> While you are at it, "git clone -l -s -n" might be more interesting.
> 
>

Sure:

time git clone -l -s -n linux-2.6.git linux-2.6.git.lsn

real 0m0.458s user 0m0.020s sys 0m0.027s

Speed demon. I'd use it, but I often need a checkout anyway, so...

time git clone -l -s linux-2.6.git linux-2.6.git.ls

real 0m35.752s user 0m2.661s sys 0m2.374s

Not really better than git clone -l and relies on the tools more. However, it should make for easier repacking and pruning. I'll keep it.

-- 
GPG Key id:  0xD1F10BA2
Fingerprint: 96E2 304A B9C4 949A 10A0  9105 9543 0453 D1F1 0BA2

AstralStorm