Re: [PATCH] "master" should be treated no differently from any other branch
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Dec 14, 2006, 15:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612141627090.3635@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <200612141519.44294.andyparkins@gmail.com>
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Andy Parkins wrote:
> "master" shouldn't get special treatment; making different log messages > based on the name of the branch is bad form. What if a user likes > "my/master" or "my/head" as their master branch?
I do not agree. There is usually a principal branch, where you collect the topics, and you do want to treat that special. As for the name: better have a convention here than configurability. You would not want "git" to be called "guitar" for some users, just because they happen to like that name more, either, right?
Ciao, Dscho