Re: [PATCH] "master" should be treated no differently from any other branch
- From
- Jerome Lovy <t2a2e9z8ncbs9qg@brefemail.com>
- Date
- Dec 14, 2006, 16:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <458179B4.7020408@brefemail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612141627090.3635@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Hi,
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Andy Parkins wrote: > >> "master" shouldn't get special treatment; making different log messages >> based on the name of the branch is bad form. What if a user likes >> "my/master" or "my/head" as their master branch? > > I do not agree. There is usually a principal branch, where you collect the > topics, and you do want to treat that special. As for the name: better > have a convention here than configurability. You would not want "git" to > be called "guitar" for some users, just because they happen to like that > name more, either, right?
because I like the pattern framework described in the book "Software Configuration Management Patterns", I like to use "mainline" instead of "master", for example.
Jérôme