Re: [PATCH] "master" should be treated no differently from any other branch
- From
John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
- Date
- Dec 14, 2006, 17:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20061214174251.GA16819@tuxdriver.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <200612141519.44294.andyparkins@gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:19:44PM +0000, Andy Parkins wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> This patch makes all merge log messages of the form: > > Merge branch XXXX into YYYY > > Regardless of whether YYYY is master or not. > > "master" shouldn't get special treatment; making different log messages > based on the name of the branch is bad form. What if a user likes > "my/master" or "my/head" as their master branch?
Why not drop the "into YYYY" part for everyone else? I don't find it useful at all, and is just confusing if I merge to a temporary branch and then pull that into master later.
John
-- John W. Linville