Re: [PATCH] "master" should be treated no differently from any other branch
Johannes Schindelin escreveu:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Andy Parkins wrote:
>
>> "master" shouldn't get special treatment; making different log messages
>> based on the name of the branch is bad form. What if a user likes
>> "my/master" or "my/head" as their master branch?
>
> I do not agree. There is usually a principal branch, where you collect the
> topics, and you do want to treat that special. As for the name: better
> have a convention here than configurability. You would not want "git" to
> be called "guitar" for some users, just because they happen to like that
> name more, either, right?
Disagree: I have two principal branches, master and stable/2.10. I don't see
why the latter should get different commit messages.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xs4all.nl>