Re: Git-commits mailing list feed.
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- Apr 25, 2005, 01:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504241846290.18901@ppc970.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <426C4168.6030008@dwheeler.com>
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005, David A. Wheeler wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> > It may be better to have them as simple detached signatures, which are > completely separate files (see gpg --detached). > Yeah, gpg currently implements detached signatures > by repeating what gets signed, which is unfortunate, > but the _idea_ is the right one.
Actually, if we do totally separate files, then the detached thing is ok, and we migth decide to not call the objects at all, since that seems to be unnecessarily complex.
Maybe we'll just have signed tags by doing exactly that: just a collection of detached signature files. The question becomes one of how to name such things in a distributed tree. That is the thing that using an object for them would have solved very naturally.
Linus