Re: Git-commits mailing list feed.
- From
- Fabian Franz <fabianfranz@gmx.de>
- Date
- Apr 25, 2005, 02:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200504250417.17231.FabianFranz@gmx.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504241846290.18901@ppc970.osdl.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 25. April 2005 03:50 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> Maybe we'll just have signed tags by doing exactly that: just a collection > of detached signature files. The question becomes one of how to name such > things in a distributed tree. That is the thing that using an object for > them would have solved very naturally.
What about just <sha1 hash of object>.sig or <sha1 hash of object>.asc?
Or would this violate the concept of the object database to just contain hashes?
cu
Fabian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCbFMsI0lSH7CXz7MRAof0AKCILjPE/M72cMSVNDC/DWYSzmrU/ACggOuS ogNPwUf2ASAwmbwixzSTuPs= =pW5D -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----