Re: [RFC] General object parsing
- From
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
- Date
- Apr 18, 2005, 03:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.21.0504172337380.30848-100000@iabervon.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.21.0504172206460.30848-100000@iabervon.org>
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> > But if there are simple helper functions to get the "next backwards in > > time" case (by looking at the parent dates in a merge), then that should > > be ok to do incrementally. > > Haven't written that yet, but I can do so.
Okay, I wrote this. I now have a merge-base that will find the most recent ancestor while never looking at any parents of any commit older than the answer. (But I'll let the previous stuff get reviewed first)
-Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*