Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] {apply,alias}: convert pre-processor macros to enums
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- Feb 15, 2023, 00:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cT98gscoD=Fh-QzJxruxdZmjGKW3gy95cA3xAokV7J4rw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CADE8NaqvP1JbLL89prOCu2Qo-ZVJTTN_CZjk7bJwzMctV9Z2Bw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:00 PM Vinayak Dev <vinayakdev.sci@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 at 03:31, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: > > Vinayak Dev <vinayakdev.sci@gmail.com> writes: > > > Revert changes to alias.c, and change variable types in apply.c > > > > When you send out a rerolled series, you do not have to show your > > past mistakes. This [v2] is structured as a three patch series > > whose first one makes a similar mess as what [v1] did, the second > > one and the third one then revert some parts of that earlier mess. > > > > That is not what you want to show your reviewers, and more > > importantly, that is not what we want to record in our history. > > Rerolling a series is your chance to pretend that you are much > > better programmer than you who wrote the [v1] patch. The review > > exchange is to help you do that. Please take advantage of that. > > > > You may find "git rebase -i" is a useful tool to help you pretend > > that you got to the ideal end result without these "I tried this > > first, which was wrong in these points, which I correct in a > > subsequent step" steps. > > OK, I will keep that in mind before sending subsequent patches. > Should I re-send [v2] after making corrections for this mistake? > That would make the corrections more obvious and the mistakes less.
You should send a v3 which completely replaces v1 and v2.
To prepare v3, use the "squash" (or "fixup") command of `git rebase -i` to squash all three patches from v2 into a single patch, so that v3 consists of just one patch. The squashed patch should contain only changes to "apply.c"; specifically, changing #define to `enum`, and changing the variable declarations from `int` to `enum`.
You can also update the commit message of the squashed patch so that it explains the reason for the patch: specifically, the debugger will display the values symbolically rather than as mere numbers.
Finally, proofread the commit message and the patch itself, and resubmit as v3.