Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] config: don't implicitly use gitdir
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 13, 2017, 21:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPc5daWpXnkNyuGNtFi4YTyB+Np5Yw8yZCGwu5VNzv+WON1u2Q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170613215138.GM133952@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What is the next step, then? You can find the notion ridiculous but > it's how this project has worked in my experience (and how other > projects with similar patch-based workflows work).
Does "patch-based" have much to do with this? I agree that distributed nature of the development would bring this issue, but I tend to think that using merge/pull based workflow would not alleviate it--am I mistaken?