Re: [PATCH] SQUASH
- From
Carlo Arenas <carenas@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 12, 2019, 12:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPUEspiFuvgMQ3W1se1B=8aTTrQsJSZTyQTzG1TpiyN8HTOpkA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <370b308e-40a2-4edd-b0db-ab0fb84d1c9e@web.de>
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:14 AM René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> wrote:
> > That looks like an issue worth its own commit.
OK, but then will make my topic interesting; indeed it almost feels like it should be 3 different topics all depending of each other in a chain:
* really use the match context * move to xmalloc (2 patches, one for each PCRE library) * fix leak
Which then will conflict with ab/pcre-jit-fixes before it can get merged to pu
> I wonder if we'd want to pass pcre2_match_context to pcre2_match() a few > lines down as well, for consistency.
yes, that is actually what was tested[1] as can be seen in github where Dscho integration did most of the heavy lifting with Windows
Carlo
[1] https://github.com/git/git/pull/627