Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] config doc: mention future aspirations for transfer.fsckObjects
- From
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 25, 2018, 20:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAP8UFD2wpdTnis1zcjkHFnWDN5ZB+puWrGDX4m_cFWsgvNHn5g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180525192811.25680-5-avarab@gmail.com>
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:28 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > Jeff King has said on at least a couple of occasions (at least one of > Let's note that in the documentation so we don't seem to be claiming > that this is by design. A previous version of this change called the > current behavior a "bug", that's probably too strong a claim, but I > don't think anyone would dislike a hypothetical local quarantine > patch, so let's we might change this in the future.
Maybe: s/so let's we might/so let's say we might/